![]() |
Attention | Topic was automatically imported from the old Question2Answer platform. |
![]() |
Asked By | freakcoco |
something like Ruby pipe
foo("fist input") |> bar |> print
![]() |
Attention | Topic was automatically imported from the old Question2Answer platform. |
![]() |
Asked By | freakcoco |
something like Ruby pipe
foo("fist input") |> bar |> print
![]() |
Reply From: | Eric Ellingson |
I think you are stuck with:
var output = foo("first input")
output = bar(output)
print(output)
Wouldn’t the closest equivalent to that sample code be to avoid the variable with simple nested calls, i.e: print( bar( foo("first input") ) )
Peter Boughton | 2019-08-19 18:52
Probably, but readability is generally preferred to brevity (At least in my opinion)
Eric Ellingson | 2019-08-19 18:59